Ed Driscoll points out the heinous double-standard in place between the way TEA Party rallies were covered (and distorted) and the way that #Occupy violence is hushed up.
"In 2009 and 2010, the media trashed the Tea Party, using the crazied, hyperbolic language possible — and yet were envious of their success at the polls last November, and wanted a Tea Party of their own. Hence, Occupy Wall Street. Richard Fernandez asks a great question at the Belmont Club. Did the MSM’s intensely negative reporting cause them (directly or indirectly) to amp up the craziness at OWS to waaaay past 11 on Nigel Tufnel’s Marshall stack, or is that simply what happens when a mass of people with an ill-defined cause co-habituate in an urban Burning Man festival for months on end?"
H/T: Instapundit
|
|
|---|
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


No comments:
Post a Comment